12 Angry Men (1957)

Courtrooms always seem to get the glory—attractive lawyers passionately defending or prosecuting some complex case, snide remarks to a judge threatening contempt, and a resolution that feels hard-fought and just. Equally as important, yet often overlooked, are the juries who decide these cases. The story here is as simple as the title: a jury, retiring after the completion of a murder trial, deliberate and discuss the case to try to reach a verdict. What makes this story so damn interesting is how well chosen each of the twelve personalities are. Some just want to leave and get back to their lives, some genuinely want to discuss the case, some are convinced with solid thinking, some just go along with the prevailing crowd. It's fascinating to watch them bounce off of each other, arguing their perception of the facts, and slowly let a clearer view of their decision come together. The film doesn't play for some grander message about what is good and great about the justice system, merely that everything is more complicated than the surface tends to show.

8 out of 10.